Expanded ULEZ

I'm sure the sensors themselves are highly accurate and fairly record the air immediately around them.
I'm laughing out loud at MBK getting a hard on, at a few random results.
 
Thats a fair cop, I only looked at data for the last 12 months, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
 
Ulez expansion to greater London wasn't specifically mentioned by khan iirc, when seeking re-election last time, but the high levels of pollution in london do justify action. Will be interesting to see how he does next time. The tory candidate sounds like a gob ****e disaster.

Blup
 
motorbiking said:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

One Year Evaluation of Three Low-Cost PM2.5 Monitors

The availability of low-cost monitors marketed for use in homes has increased rapidly over the past few years due to the advancement of sensing technologies, increased awareness of urban pollution, and the rise of citizen science. The user-friendly packages ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Of course your source [missing as usual] comes from somebody paid to fluff up the argument that London is one of the most polluted places in the UK (which actually means nothing much at all).
Click to expand...
Are you saying London is NOT one of the most polluted places in the UK ?
 
carmanmemoranda said:
Are you saying London is NOT one of the most polluted places in the UK ?
Click to expand...

That's like saying that the palms of your hands are one of the dirtiest parts of your body, even though you've just got out of the shower.

And, "London" is a big place: I was in Stourbridge this week, central London the week before and, where I was, Stourbridge was much worse.
 
Brigadier said:
That's like saying that the palms of your hands are one of the dirtiest parts of your body, even though you've just got out of the shower.

And, "London" is a big place: I was in Stourbridge this week, central London the week before and, where I was, Stourbridge was much worse.
Click to expand...
It's a fair question. Your view or opinion or 1 day occurrence is anecdotal

Whether anybody likes ulez or not, trying to claim London is not 1 of the most polluted parts of the UK is obviously wrong .
 
carmanmemoranda said:
It's a fair question. Your view or opinion or 1 day occurrence is anecdotal
Click to expand...

Every time I go to Central "London", which is at least monthly.

carmanmemoranda said:
Whether anybody likes ulez or not, trying to claim London is not 1 of the most polluted parts of the UK is obviously wrong
Click to expand...

Like trying to pretend that the whole of "London" is in the same situation.
It's so far from being in the same situation, it might as well be different continents.
 
Brigadier said:
Every time I go to Central "London", which is at least monthly.



Like trying to pretend that the whole of "London" is in the same situation.
It's so far from being in the same situation, it might as well be different continents.
Click to expand...
So thats good enough reason to ignore pollution ?

I'm there at least monthly currently and I know its polluted. Just by the traffic smell

Very poor argument for you, I expect better
 
Mottie said:
So you don’t want to answer that question or can’t?
Click to expand...
You can have pockets of heavy pollution, where traffic is concerned as is shown with certain stretches of busy motorways and their respective speed restrictions. It's very idiosyncratic where there are concentrations of vehicles, coupled with geographical conditions. One thing is for sure - remove the traffic and you remove the pollution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top