You've questioned nothing but ignorance love.
Whatever sort of heat it is, doesn't it affect the temperature of the room? Of course, rule number one is not to put any thermostat where the sun shines. The extra delay due to the slow sensor in a TRV cannot be an advantage. The heating / cooling time of the room is there, whatever so no worries about 'smoothing out' any change in temperature. A room stat can be moved to a 'good' place in the room but a TRV is stuck where it is.
I am impressed that. at last, someone has actually come up with the fact that some heating engineers use temperature monitoring. It has taken more than 70 post for that piece of information to come out. Rag Tag and Bobtail seemed to think that temperature measurement is only for wimps and they shout pretty loud on this forum. Your bits of sense have been diluted by a large number of idiot postings from more immature contributors. Your ideas of control theory are not quite complete, which is why I didn't give your post much thought. Yes, I do understand the basis of what you are saying but response times of all elements in the loop are relevant. Just because it's hot water and pumps involved, the same basic theory applies to all feedback systems. (I don't fancy myself as an 'expert' in heating, all of a sudden because the same considerations apply in all sorts of fields of control.) In a good system, the radiators would maintain a steady temperature with a proportional control for the valve being held in one place until conditions change and the control would be critically damped - by design. An electronic thermometer will give a high open loop gain of the system. The gain would be known and an intelligent controller will adjust it for optimum. The software is available and easy to implement so I'd be surprised if it's not included.Whatever sort of heat it is, doesn't it affect the temperature of the room? Of course, rule number one is not to put any thermostat where the sun shines. The extra delay due to the slow sensor in a TRV cannot be an advantage. The heating / cooling time of the room is there, whatever so no worries about 'smoothing out' any change in temperature. A room stat can be moved to a 'good' place in the room but a TRV is stuck where it is.
I have tried to explain to you but you don't seem to want to try to understand!
Let me repeat yet again!
A radiator take about 10 min to heat up and 20 min to cold down!
With that length of time to respond there is no advantage in a more rapidly responding control.
Even more so the slower response of the TRV actualy works together with the response time of the rad to better control the room temperature.
You will obviously be surprised but some heating engineers do actually have temperature monitors they can leave at premises to check the operation of the controls.
Tony
It has taken more than 70 post for that piece of information to come out
the more modern approach for continuous fine tuning
Yes, I do understand the basis of what you are saying but response times of all elements in the loop are relevant. Just because it's hot water and pumps involved, the same basic theory applies to all feedback systems. (I don't fancy myself as an 'expert' in heating, all of a sudden because the same considerations apply in all sorts of fields of control.) In a good system, the radiators would maintain a steady temperature with a proportional control for the valve being held in one place until conditions change and the control would be critically damped - by design. An electronic thermometer will give a high open loop gain of the system. The gain would be known and an intelligent controller will adjust it for optimum.
No. It's basic control theory that's been around since long before Wiki was invented. If you know nothing about control theory then don't knock it. ("Drivel" = " I don't understand it"?) Can I give you some references?Now there's some bolloocxs right there. Wikipedia? Or did you actually dream up that drivel?
I am impressed that. at last, someone has actually come up with the fact that some heating engineers use temperature monitoring. It has taken more than 70 post for that piece of information to come out. Rag Tag and Bobtail seemed to think that temperature measurement is only for wimps and they shout pretty loud on this forum. Your bits of sense have been diluted by a large number of idiot postings from more immature contributors. Your ideas of control theory are not quite complete, which is why I didn't give your post much thought. Yes, I do understand the basis of what you are saying but response times of all elements in the loop are relevant. Just because it's hot water and pumps involved, the same basic theory applies to all feedback systems. (I don't fancy myself as an 'expert' in heating, all of a sudden because the same considerations apply in all sorts of fields of control.) In a good system, the radiators would maintain a steady temperature with a proportional control for the valve being held in one place until conditions change and the control would be critically damped - by design. An electronic thermometer will give a high open loop gain of the system. The gain would be known and an intelligent controller will adjust it for optimum. The software is available and easy to implement so I'd be surprised if it's not included.Whatever sort of heat it is, doesn't it affect the temperature of the room? Of course, rule number one is not to put any thermostat where the sun shines. The extra delay due to the slow sensor in a TRV cannot be an advantage. The heating / cooling time of the room is there, whatever so no worries about 'smoothing out' any change in temperature. A room stat can be moved to a 'good' place in the room but a TRV is stuck where it is.
I have tried to explain to you but you don't seem to want to try to understand!
Let me repeat yet again!
A radiator take about 10 min to heat up and 20 min to cold down!
With that length of time to respond there is no advantage in a more rapidly responding control.
Even more so the slower response of the TRV actualy works together with the response time of the rad to better control the room temperature.
You will obviously be surprised but some heating engineers do actually have temperature monitors they can leave at premises to check the operation of the controls.
Tony
As you seem to be so much in favour of TRVs, I take it that you don't think much of the idea of zones and the more modern approach for continuous fine tuning. I wonder why that is. Do you think that it's just a cynical bit of hi tech marketing?
Again totally agree with your post regarding response times, imagine self drive Google car senses a pedestrian crossing and it applies brakes 20 minutes later!