- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
We don't comply with them.
More deaths in the channel.
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,607
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
We are a country of Laws, until we don't like them.
We have become a joke, what next don't like clean water regulations - lets just drink dirty water.
This madness all stems from the Tories unable to grow the economy so have to find enemies to blame.
This happened to post first world war Germany - they called it the 'stab in your back myth' - it eventually lead to the rise of Hitler because there was always someone else to blame for your failures and then they rounded up Jews.
We have learned nothing from history.
www.theholocaustexplained.org
The Stab-in-the-Back myth was the belief that the German Army did not lose the First World War on the battlefield, but were instead betrayed by the communists, socialists and Jews on the home front.
ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE
We have become a joke, what next don't like clean water regulations - lets just drink dirty water.
This madness all stems from the Tories unable to grow the economy so have to find enemies to blame.
This happened to post first world war Germany - they called it the 'stab in your back myth' - it eventually lead to the rise of Hitler because there was always someone else to blame for your failures and then they rounded up Jews.
We have learned nothing from history.
Stab-in-the-back myth – The Holocaust Explained: Designed for schools
www.theholocaustexplained.org
The Stab-in-the-Back myth was the belief that the German Army did not lose the First World War on the battlefield, but were instead betrayed by the communists, socialists and Jews on the home front.
ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE
Watching politics show on bbc now they're talking nothing but international treaties. Perhaps a stiff letter is needed to let them know Denso thinks they're misleading the public and should get their house in order
Evidently we don't comply with the UN Convention on asylum.
Ansd Rishi wants to ignore the ECHR.
That's just for starters.
Did this get a mention on here?
The UK, which says Rwanda is safe for asylum seekers, grants asylum to Rwandans | News24
The UK government granted asylum seekers from Rwanda refuge on the basis that they would not be safe in their home country, even as it argued Rwanda was a safe destination to which it could send asylum seekers, a new analysis of government data shows.
www.news24.com
UK government admits Rwanda has ‘issues with its human rights record’
Assessment comes despite claims by Rishi Sunak that Rwanda is safe when making case for asylum policy
www.theguardian.com
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
It's demonstrably true, international immigration and human rights agreements are not followed.
So what your saying your falling for it all, no surprise there then.
Roll eyes.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
Keep reading. Costs costs costs. And consider inflation on income
Still waiting for this supposed evidence that you claim to have posted.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
Not a lack of funding then, as you claimed.
How much more mis information are we having today ?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,782
- Reaction score
- 2,371
- Country
Notch found their financial reports and charity charter. I’m sure others can too
If expenses are greater than income you have a lack of funding.
How much more hard of thinking and acting dumb are we going to have today?
If expenses are greater than income you have a lack of funding.
How much more hard of thinking and acting dumb are we going to have today?
We already know that motorbiking conducts experiments by starting with a conclusion, then finding the results to justify his conclusion.
So you have not presented any evidence?
You expect us to go looking for the evidence to support your claims, again?
How many more false claims are we going to have today?
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 803
- Country
I'm not sure. But will watch all your inaccurate posts and tell you later. But there's a lot of no thinking and "acting" dumb from you so far
Increased funding is not a lack of funding.
One of your classics.
Nor is increased costs a decrease in funding.