More deaths in the channel.

I'm sure over time more funding is better than a decrease.

Is it enough? Who knows, but I'm sure they will look at expenses and work it out.

His original claim was reduced funding. Not true was it
Motorbiking claims to have presented evidence to prove his claim. :rolleyes:
Then he suggested we go and look for it, for him. :ROFLMAO:
 
If your business charges £100 for a job that costs £110. You double your sales. Are you doing well or are you going out of business?
is that your business or mine.

I work on figures over days weeks and months, not a 1 off.

If my costs go up and I don't increase income I earn less. Its a big step before it is negative.

If my income goes up, I call it an increase, even if expenses increase too

Accuracy important in your business?
 
Notch found their financial reports and charity charter. I’m sure others can too

If expenses are greater than income you have a lack of funding.

How much more hard of thinking and acting dumb are we going to have today?
”if expenses are greater than income you have a lack of funding”

untrue

it is a charity, it would be true if that was over many years, but that isn’t the case



you claimed: “They are making cut backs due to lack of funding and overstretched resources”

you have yet to provide evidence of either point.
 
Oh dear the hard of thinking think that if you spend more than you receive that’s ok.
 
Oh dear the hard of thinking think that if you spend more than you receive that’s ok.
That wasn't your argument. You claimed that donations had decreased. They haven't.
And during times of high inflation donors are less likely to give. Ask sillyboy.
He stopped his donations on an ideoligical objection to RNLI rescuing non-white people.
 
Nope I said they were making cutbacks because of a lack of sufficient funding. They spend more than they receive. That’s evident in their accounts.

Some think they have £800m in the bank because they don’t understand what access to funds means (loans available).
 
Back
Top