More deaths in the channel.

of otherwise healthy people that could be so easily avoided ?
You think we are being played by loony left news organisations because they report deaths that are a very small number compared to deaths on the roads.

By extension, you are pushing your road death narrative wrongly because there are much bigger killers around.
 
You've got nothing better, OK.

Doubt any plan is fully water tight. Criminals come in all shapes sizes and colours
That wasn't hard wasit, see you can voice an opinion when you pluck up the courage.
Right, now we've substantiated that no system is water tight, we move onto processing them faster, the question with that is do you create another problem by increasing the numbers whereby the infrastructure can't cope, (it's open to debate whether we are now at that point)
Where I'd be looking to solve the problem is going to the source, which is all these unelected world bodies dictating policy.
 
That's the problem when you won't answer simple questions. People will assume things on your behalf.
No, there is a select few who do that and you and carman are leaders in your own right on that score.
 
That wasn't hard wasit, see you can voice an opinion when you pluck up the courage.
Right, now we've substantiated that no system is water tight, we move onto processing them faster, the question with that is do you create another problem by increasing the numbers whereby the infrastructure can't cope, (it's open to debate whether we are now at that point)
Where I'd be looking to solve the problem is going to the source, which is all these unelected world bodies dictating policy.
So just words with no idea. Got ya
 
That wasn't hard wasit, see you can voice an opinion when you pluck up the courage.
Right, now we've substantiated that no system is water tight, we move onto processing them faster, the question with that is do you create another problem by increasing the numbers whereby the infrastructure can't cope, (it's open to debate whether we are now at that point)
Where I'd be looking to solve the problem is going to the source, which is all these unelected world bodies dictating policy.
So just words with no idea.
That wasn't hard wasit, see you can voice an opinion when you pluck up the courage.
Right, now we've substantiated that no system is water tight, we move onto processing them faster, the question with that is do you create another problem by increasing the numbers whereby the infrastructure can't cope, (it's open to debate whether we are now at that point)
Where I'd be looking to solve the problem is going to the source, which is all these unelected world bodies dictating policy.
I've been saying exactly the same on this subject and you've just noticed "an opinion "

How come you've suddenly noticed ?
 
Seems you haven't if that's the only thing you can come up with.
OK.

Explain this.

Where I'd be looking to solve the problem is going to the source, which is all these unelected world bodies dictating policy.


Otherwise its just weasle words
 
Back
Top