More deaths in the channel.

And do what?
On my own nothing (no man is an island)
But all is not lost I hear more people asking the question "who do I vote for" with good reason, politicians no longer have any qualms in not hiding their contempt of the people they create laws for.
 
Oh, these "world bodies" are organising the boats, and those who ride in them?
People are leaving Afghanistan because the Taliban are doing what the illuminati tell them to do.

Sumfink like that anyway.
 
You think we are being played by loony left news organisations because they report deaths that are a very small number compared to deaths on the roads.

By extension, you are pushing your road death narrative wrongly because there are much bigger killers around.
Whatever comparison you wish to make, to focus in the extensive way the BBC do on such small occurrences, 1 death every 50 days, is to play a political game.

4 homeless people per day die in the UK who would probably not of died had they had a suitable place to live. (this is 200x greater in numbers than migrants dying crossing the channel)

Why are they homeless? there is a massive housing shortage
Why is there a massive housing shortage? because we need to find homes for 600,000 migrants per year entering the country, they must come first for some reason.

May be the narrative should be; if we could stop the inward immigration then we could save four homeless people dying every day - homeless people dying must not be newsworthy in the far left minds of the BBC.
 
Whatever comparison you wish to make, to focus in the extensive way the BBC do on such small occurrences, 1 death every 50 days, is to play a political game.

4 homeless people per day die in the UK who would probably not of died had they had a suitable place to live. (this is 200x greater in numbers than migrants dying crossing the channel)

Why are they homeless? there is a massive housing shortage
Why is there a massive housing shortage? because we need to find homes for 600,000 migrants per year entering the country, they must come first for some reason.

May be the narrative should be; if we could stop the inward immigration then we could save four homeless people dying every day - homeless people dying must not be newsworthy in the far left minds of the BBC.
But you are not addressing this?

Until you get on top of this there will always be deaths, housing shortages, costs (profit for a lucky few).

The issue is not being touched. It needs keeping in the news to force some action.

The BBc isnt far left
 
Carol Voorderman rips in to Cruella's for her weasel words, good on her.


Blup
 
Whatever comparison you wish to make, to focus in the extensive way the BBC do on such small occurrences, 1 death every 50 days, is to play a political game.

4 homeless people per day die in the UK who would probably not of died had they had a suitable place to live. (this is 200x greater in numbers than migrants dying crossing the channel)

Why are they homeless? there is a massive housing shortage
Why is there a massive housing shortage? because we need to find homes for 600,000 migrants per year entering the country, they must come first for some reason.

May be the narrative should be; if we could stop the inward immigration then we could save four homeless people dying every day - homeless people dying must not be newsworthy in the far left minds of the BBC.
You are intenionally trying to digress the discussion, and with several false narratives:
We don't need to house 600,000 immigrants per year, entering the country, and they don't come first.
The hosing crisis is not due to immigration. Two homeless people are dying each day, on average, not four!.
To prevent the homeless dying there are quite a few other options than providing them with a new house.
But that's a digression.
Start a new thread if you wish me to continue this discussion. But you need to post truthful comments, otherwise I will only be exposing your false narratives.
 
Back
Top