- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
And put them where? Rwanda is filling up fast...No ID, should mean automatic rejection.
And put them where? Rwanda is filling up fast...No ID, should mean automatic rejection.
Fingers crossed eh, Nosey?However, the UK could slip down the table when the figures come out again next year,
In some cases they wont have any. Fact of life where they come from.No ID, should mean automatic rejection.
Er not so niseallSays trans, with his renowned and repetitive hatred of 'pencil pushers and deadbeats' amongst other irrational hatreds of the French and other foreigners.
Disgusting human being.
Nonsense. I'm just posting the parts of the article that the morons missed, i.e. 95% of it apparently. Headlines and the RWR eh.Fingers crossed eh, Nosey?
Nothing at all. It's great we have that to fluff the numbers up.
How many cranes does it take to export sevices?
How many ships does it take to export services?
How many factories does it take to export services?
How many road hauliers does it take to export services?
How many trains or aircraft does it take to export services?
No, services is a great export which can be turned on and off like a tap and is volatile and subject to peaks and troughs. Did you read the whole (moron grabbing) article, or just the headline, lol.
Basically an easy come easy go type of export. Hence the caution and the inevitable tank, back to reality. Even admitted as much in the article. Get a grown up to help you past the headline, boyo.You seem to be a bit dim.
Financial services... doesn't involve cranes or ships, what's your point?
Engineering consultancy - e.g. design an oil rig, industrial process or suspension bridge for us.
Design consultancy - architecture, planning, surveying, etc.
Accountancy and legal services.
The list goes on.
There is a strong demand for expert services like these in the world and a lot of people in this country have very well paid jobs thanks to it. Lots of companies ply their trade at home and abroad in these fields. World class universities (far better than any in Europe) help.
Doesn't require ships or cranes - requires brains, computers and internet connections.
As for the other types of exports, we would be even more successful in these areas if left wing eco cretins like you were not clammering for ever more regulation, expensive energy and high taxation - all of which puts us at a competitive disadvantage and sends industry abroad - whilst creating no net environmental benefit whatsoever.
So you support failure and then revel in pointing it out if you perceive it is happening. Your mentality is that of a spiteful loser.
Basically an easy come easy go type of export.
And put them where? Rwanda is filling up fast...
Not possible without return agreementWe should send them back to where they came from
Not legalIf they have trouble remembering, then being left on an old ship in the North Sea for a while should help jog their memory
Let them work thenNot: feel free to stay here forever at our expense
Then they go to jaileven if you commit rape or murder
What you’ve suggested is nonsenseThe existing situation, as it is being played out, is actually much more extreme than what I have suggested
The article?What does that even mean?
The article?
I'll show you...
However, the UK could slip down the table when the figures come out again next year, with a recent report finding that the value of total goods exports fell by £17.4 billion (4.4 per cent), between 2022 and 2023.
Last month's Office for National Statistics report said this was primarily because of falling imports and exports of fuels.
It added that, after adjusting for inflation, the UK imported and exported less in 2023 than it did in 2018.
In another blow to UK business, Britain and Canada paused talks over a new free trade agreement in January, meaning a post-Brexit arrangement with Canada is set to expire.
'Nothing to see here', says the post title. Except of course if you can get a grown up to read past the moron-grabbing headline of course.
Not a clue.CPTPP, relax.
Not a clue.
The short-term gains are marginal.This, I think
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
Although, I think it's only forecast to boost GDP by about 0.1% over the next twenty years.