Paris Olympics, Womens Boxing

Mrs Doubtfyre said:
If you have any alternative explanations, I'd be interested to hear them
Click to expand...

That the user(name)s have been banned, for persistent flouting of forum rules.

An explanation that has at least as much validity as does the one you subscribe to, and far more credibility (y)
 
Brigadier said:
That the user(name)s have been banned, for persistent flouting of forum rules.

An explanation that has at least as much validity as does the one you subscribe to, and far more credibility (y)
Click to expand...
Flouting of forum rules, like exposing racism, or objecting to racist posts, or complaining that racist comments, and the objection to them, are sanitised.
Or complaining that racist posters are allowed and supported to continue to post racist comments?

I didn't see that in the forum rules.
 
Brigadier said:
:giggle: That the user(name)s have been banned, for persistent flouting of forum rules.

An explanation that has at least as much validity as does the one you subscribe to, and far more credibility (y)
Click to expand...

One of the users names was got rid off via a post on here from the powers that be with the wording

“ had enough of your racist mantra “

Than he was gone

If you search hard enough it’s probably still on here ? Some where ?

There used to be a lady poster in here nice lady
He bullied her ;) I liked her she was a former journalist spent some time in the Lebanon my sister was out there around that time (afaik)

If I recall I have 7 user names on ignore there all him ;)

He has been in other forums whinging and naming people from in here :giggle:

Total fruit cake
 
transam said:
One of the users names was got rid off via a post on here from the powers that be with the wording

“ had enough of your racist mantra “
Click to expand...
Thanks for that transam. It reinforces what I was saying, and which Brigadier was questioning.
 
transam said:
There used to be a lady poster in here nice lady
He bullied her ;) I liked her she was a former journalist spent some time in the Lebanon my sister was out there around that time (afaik)
Click to expand...
What was her name. I'll have a look at the posts, see if they support your allegations.
 
Brigadier said:
No it doesn't. It says that the poster was banned for having a "racist mantra".




Rather than support your guess, it completely opposes it.
Click to expand...

It was doubt fire his account was closed at that time

It’s also
Be suggested to me by 3 others in the past that he was running numerous PCs

Another one of his tactics was an attempt to intimidate with his
“ snap smile campaign” taking screen shots and posting em up elsewhere was the threat ??? Probably after he edited what some one had actually said ??? So as to fit his narrative

I don’t see any of his posts and have not for a good while :cool:
 
Brigadier said:
No it doesn't. It says that the poster was banned for having a "racist mantra".




Rather than support your guess, it completely opposes it.
Click to expand...
No It doesn't. It isn't for 'having a racist mantra'
It's for 'the racist mantra'.

There's a subtle difference.
Your version is for being racist, which I'm sure those banned were not racist, otherwise why complain about the self-confessed racists?
And why were the self-confessed racists not banned for their racist comments?
The other is easily read as the author doesn't like someone objecting to, or exposing the racism.
 
transam said:
It was doubt fire his account was closed at that time
Click to expand...
I'm still here. :rolleyes:

transam said:
It’s also
Be suggested to me by 3 others in the past that he was running numerous PCs
Click to expand...
At the same time?
Wow, I'll have to try that. :rolleyes:

transam said:
Another one of his tactics was an attempt to intimidate with his
“ snap smile campaign” taking screen shots and posting em up elsewhere was the threat ??? Probably after he edited what some one had actually said ??? So as to fit his narrative
Click to expand...
So you claim that the racist posts were an invention of his/hers?
But Reganandcarter has admitted to being a racist. So why would there be any need to invent some imaginary racist comments? :rolleyes:


transam said:
I don’t see any of his posts and have not for a good while :cool:
Click to expand...
But you claim to be well informed on the behaviour of these posters. :rolleyes:
Do you ask others for what's going on? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Brigadier said:
By someone who reads into things, that which suits their narrative.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you appreciate that works both ways.
I can understand one or even two of these previous users that may have been practising their racist mantra, and being banned for it.
Brigadier said:
No it doesn't. It says that the poster was banned for having a "racist mantra".
Click to expand...
But it's very evident that people (or certain people) are not banned for being racist.
So to argue that some of these previous users were banned for 'having a racist mantra' is obviously not credible.

Therefore I think it's evident that the previous users were banned for 'the racist mantra', i.e objecting to the racist comments from others.
Especially when those racist others are still here, still openly admitting their racism, and still their racist comments are being sanitised without them being banned.

I feel sure that it is you that is reading into things, that which suits their narrative.
 
Last edited:
Brigadier said:
One doesn't need a crowbar and a very tangential acquaintance with common usage though (y)
Click to expand...
One might need a tool for common usage, and if one thinks what would be useful, one might design a crowbar, even though one had never had any previous tangential acquaintance with it. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top