Radicalisation under our very noses.

Who do you suggest, Abu Hamza? He can be both a prisoner and an Imam. Maybe Andem Choudary? Or even Abu Bakar? Take your pick. (Other Muslim Imam terrorists are available).
Other religious leaders are employed, why not employ Imams from the local mosque?
Is it beyond the wit and ability to vet the applicants and employ someone suitable? :rolleyes:
The prison service would not allow Catholoic sex offenders to give succour to Catholics.
Why are Muslims treated differently?
Or maybe it's all a load of right-wing Muslim bashing? :rolleyes:
 
Other religious leaders are employed, why not employ Imams from the local mosque?
Is it beyond the wit and ability to vet the applicants and employ someone suitable? :rolleyes:
The prison service would not allow Catholoic sex offenders to give succour to Catholics.
Why are Muslims treated differently?
Or maybe it's all a load of right-wing Muslim bashing? :rolleyes:
Would it be in these imans you talk of interests to carry out this work if it puts their lives and their families lives at risk at the hands of these radicals. Rolls eyes.
 
It doesn't. That doesn't say asylum seekers can pick and choose either. Because they can't.
So they've no right to apply to any country signed up to 19 51 convention and remain there until their assessment is assessed
Given there free to come and go once they've applied for asylum till that assessment has be made, that's open door in my book given how many are returned to their country of origin and the ease to 'disappear' into the underworld that operates in this country.
The supermarkets will tell you how much stuff they shift as opposed to the official figures that live here.
 
Would it be in these imans you talk of interests to carry out this work if it puts their lives and their families lives at risk at the hands of these radicals. Rolls eyes.
How would Imams giving sucour and education to Muslims, put their lives and those of their families at risk? :rolleyes:
If your theory was in the slightest bit correct, Muslim extremists would be attacking Imams all over the world. :rolleyes:
 
How would Imams giving sucour and education to Muslims, put their lives and those of their families at risk? :rolleyes:
If your theory was in the slightest bit correct, Muslim extremists would be attacking Imams all over the world. :rolleyes:
You never worked with crims then, thought so your naivety displays that fact.
Roll eyes.
 
So they've no right to apply to any country signed up to 19 51 convention and remain there until their assessment is assessed
No, not in the UK.
Given there free to come and go once they've applied for asylum till that assessment has be made
They can't apply in the UK.
 
So they've no right to apply to any country signed up to 19 51 convention and remain there until their assessment is assessed
They can only apply when they arrive. So they need to arrive first. Then they can apply. :rolleyes:

Given there free to come and go once they've applied for asylum till that assessment has be made,
Come and go where? :rolleyes:

that's open door in my book
A little while ago, you were saying that no-one was coming through those opening doors. :rolleyes:
which is nothing to with whose coming through those opening doors.


given how many are returned to their country of origin and the ease to 'disappear' into the underworld that operates in this country.
You mean that because the asylum system in UK is not fit for purpose, all asylum seekers, sucessful or not are allowed to stay?
Who do you blame for that, the asylum seekers? They didn't break the system. :rolleyes:

The supermarkets will tell you how much stuff they shift as opposed to the official figures that live here.
You've resorted to gantish now because you're not mkaing sense. :rolleyes:
 
No, not in the UK.

They can't apply in the UK.
So your saying Britains not signed up to that international treaty. I think you might find that pending.
In the meantime there's been arrivals arriving this week by dingy, where have they gone not from whence they came. What's that if it's not an open door.
 
They can only apply when they arrive. So they need to arrive first. Then they can apply. :rolleyes:


Come and go where? :rolleyes:


A little while ago, you were saying that no-one was coming through those opening doors. :rolleyes:




You mean that because the asylum system in UK is not fit for purpose, all asylum seekers, sucessful or not are allowed to stay?
Who do you blame for that, the asylum seekers? They didn't break the system. :rolleyes:


You've resorted to gantish now because you're not mkaing sense. :rolleyes:
Roll eyes, not worth entertaining you.
 
You never worked with crims then, thought so your naivety displays that fact.
Roll eyes.
So the lives of all religious leaders, and those of their families are at risk for giving succour to prisoners?
Have you told the religious leaders? :rolleyes:
Maybe we could look to see how many religious leaders have been threatened, suffered violence, etc for giving succour to prisoiners. :rolleyes:
 
So the lives of all religious leaders, and those of their families are at risk for giving succour to prisoners?
Have you told the religious leaders? :rolleyes:
Maybe we could look to see how many religious leaders have been threatened, suffered violence, etc for giving succour to prisoiners. :rolleyes:
Roll eyes let's see how many are clamouring at the gate to take the role on roll eyes.
 
Back
Top