The Timing and Excuse for War

Yes they did, and always have. Fortunately most of the civilised world are slowly waking up to the fact that the UN resolutions against Israel are starting to appear a little odd.

2022 - 27 resolutions criticising countries.

15 against Israel
12 against the rest of the world.

View attachment 318599
Or alternatively it shows how Israel has committed crimes against humanity so many times.
 
Would that give comfort to a baby that's been decapitated? it's alright, it's a political ploy.
Would it give any comfort to the approx 3,000 children blown up by Israeli bombs? :rolleyes:
What about the children that are having to go through surgery without aneasthetics due to the prevention of medicine caused by the blockade of Gaza?
There's been no independent evidence of babies being decapitated.

As far as lies in this conflict are concerned, a recent interview with an Israeli spokesperson, he said that the number of deaths in Gaza has been inflated by Hamas.
The reported asked what was the true figure of deaths. The Israeli spokesperson said they didn't know the true figure.

I thought he's been on DIYnot, making accusations without any supporting evidence. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Have you ever tried discussing the topic?
It's a strategy I find works for me.
The dishonesty of repeatedly coming back on here under a different guises and not admitting to the fact. Then when the mods in their wisdom allow you to stay over an extended period find they have to ban you from threads suggests your strategy is working extremely well.
 
The knave obviously cant lie straight in bed why keep giving the knave oxygen, show ponies thrive on it.
 
That’s a strawman

Hamas are a terrorist group by definition: they commit acts of terror.
Only some western governments and Israel designate Hamas as terrorists. They do so as a political ploy to demonise them, and to justify the conduct of the campaign against them.
It's very reminiscent of political campaigns where one party misrepresents the aims and ambitions of the other party. It happens every week at PM questions.
You're doing it yourself all the time by your dishonest accusations. Some people have such fragile arguments it's their only tactic.

And it's not a strawman argument. You clearly don't understand the definition of a strawman argument neither, or you are misusing the defintion.
 
Last edited:
The dishonesty of repeatedly coming back on here under a different guises and not admitting to the fact. Then when the mods in their wisdom allow you to stay over an extended period find they have to ban you from threads suggests your strategy is working extremely well.
Why would I feel the need to use different usernames?
You've implied that I've been banned. If that is the case I would have no option but to use a different username in order to return, which wouldn't be dishonest. It would be the only way to participate in any discussion.

So in other words, you think it's dishonest to be banned and return under a different username? So you think it's dishonest to disagree with the decision of a mod?
Can you expain your train of thought?
 
The knave obviously cant lie straight in bed why keep giving the knave oxygen, show ponies thrive on it.
You imply that any opinion other then yours shouldn't be allowed?
Can you explain your train of thought?
 
I-Dont-Have-A-Train-Of-Thought.jpg
 
And it's not a strawman argument
Yes it is

Hamas are terrorists because they fit the definition.

you are conveniently ignoring their acts of terror and claiming they are only deemed terrorists because of politics

thats a strawman, a desperate one at that.
 
Back
Top