The Weather

aveatry said:
Do you know where the highest temp in the uk was measured from in 2022 ??
It was a village called Coningsbury
Do you know where the thermometer was ??
It was at RAF Coningsby ;1,000 acres
It is a Main Operating Base of the RAF and home to three front-line Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4 units, No. 3 Squadron, No. 11 Squadron and No. 12 Squadron. In support of front-line units, No. 29 Squadron is the Typhoon Operational Conversion Unit and No. 41 Squadron is the Typhoon Test and Evaluation Squadron.

Oh and lots F-ing of CONCRETE.
Do you know anything about heat islands and where these thermometers are located ?
All of that is something that the BBC do not tell you when they are on their propaganded remit.
Click to expand...
Do you think scientists rely on a thermometer readings in Coningsbury, when gathering global warming data?

Lol.
 
berty3000 said:
Whatever happened to this guy?

He was on TV a lot and was very well regarded when I was a child but seemed to disappear, almost as though he were assasinated, for having a perfectly reasonable opinion.

Why is it necessary to destroy the lives of people who have opinions that differ? If he is wrong on this particular topic, why can't he just be wrong about it and be left alone or, better still, be invited to discuss the matter and have his mind changed, or allow others to form their own opinions by observing the discussion?

No, this normal process, that would occur in an open, honest and free society doesn't seem to be possible. And so we have endless gaslighting instead. Which many of us see through and are not foold by. In fact, it absolutely undermines the alarmist narrative. It screams weakness, fear and dishonesty.

View attachment 341563
Click to expand...

meter-false.jpg


​
Politifcat.com
​
 
Notch7 said:
Pointing out your rancid bullsh1t is not being opinionated

You are a foolish Brexit supporting, Trump loving climate change denier
Click to expand...
You tell yourself whatever you need to carry on blindly Motchy

Enjoy the journey
 
aveatry said:
Yes they do - all the ones that rely on the narrative that will a keep a roof over their head and Gov money in their pocket --- money that is taken out of your pocket that is removed under the guise of a climate change tax / environmental tax/ emissions tax/ carbon pricing / green tax/ carbon tax/ Climate Change Levy / need I go on. Why are you siding with the conservative government that you hate so much -- a useful idiot maybe.
Click to expand...

Meanwhile,

.....you prefer to line the pockets of the very same government with your fossil-fuel economy-based taxes, as well as keep Gulf residents in the Bugattis to which they are accustomed (y)

Whatcha gonna do when you're behind 3 billion Chinese and Indians in the queue for the black gold which, through supply and demand, is now far in excess of what you can afford?

Thumbing for a lift from someone with an EV perhaps, charged up with some lovely UK-spec winds or tides, perhaps?

Fingers crossed that those Arabs don't ramp up the prices, or even turn off the taps altogether ;-)
 
aveatry said:
Yes they do - all the ones that rely on the narrative that will a keep a roof over their head and Gov money in their pocket
Click to expand...
So science cannot be trusted, except maybe the bits you like. Gut feelings are not a good way to form an opinion on things.

Science shows you, in detail, how climate change works. Why not say where it is going wrong rather than just claiming they are all lying?
 
dns1 said:
We aren't producing anywhere near the same amounts of CO2 that volcanic activity did a few thousand years ago...
Click to expand...

As an example, the Siberian Traps (a volcanic "event" 250 million years ago) is thought to have contributed to the high temperatures of that time.

The Siberian Traps erupted continuously, for a couple of million years. IIRC; been a while since I studied the subject.

We've only had a couple of hundred years at it.
 
On Dr David Bellamy.


Had a number of views on ACC; takes yer pick.



Views on global warming[edit]​

In Bellamy's foreword to the 1989 book The Greenhouse Effect,[24] he wrote:

The profligate demands of humankind are causing far-reaching changes to the atmosphere of planet Earth, of this there is no doubt. Earth's temperature is showing an upward swing, the so-called greenhouse effect, now a subject of international concern. The greenhouse effect may melt the glaciers and ice caps of the world, causing the sea to rise and flood many of our great cities and much of our best farmland.
Click to expand...
Bellamy's later statements on global warming indicate that he subsequently changed his views. A letter he published on 16 April 2005 in New Scientist asserted that a large proportion (555 of 625) of the glaciers being observed by the World Glacier Monitoring Service were advancing, not retreating.[25] George Monbiot of The Guardian tracked down Bellamy's original source for this information and found that it was from discredited data originally published by Fred Singer, who claimed to have obtained these figures from a 1989 article in the journal Science; however, Monbiot proved that this article had never existed.[26] Bellamy subsequently accepted that his figures on glaciers were wrong, and announced in a letter to The Sunday Times in 2005 that he had "decided to draw back from the debate on global warming",[27] although Bellamy jointly authored a paper with Jack Barrett in the refereed Civil Engineering journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers, entitled "Climate stability: an inconvenient proof" in May 2007.[28]

In 2008 Bellamy signed the Manhattan Declaration, calling for the immediate halt to any tax-funded attempts to counteract climate change.[29] He maintained a view that man-made climate change is "poppycock", insisting that climate change is part of a natural cycle.[30][31]

His opinions changed the way some organisations viewed Bellamy. The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts stated in 2005, "We are not happy with his line on climate change",[32] and Bellamy, who had been president of the Wildlife Trusts since 1995,[11] was succeeded by Aubrey Manning in November 2005.[33] Bellamy asserted that his views on global warming resulted in the rejection of programme ideas by the BBC.[30][34]
 
Yes there is a climate emergency, due to greenhouse gasses.
All the people in low emitting countries are up in arms about the impact, demanding their governments reduce their already low emissions and adopt policies that place a burden on their citizens lives, while those in high emitting countries focus on growing their economy.
 
Even in its relatively early days. Harnessing the power of the wind, the sun and even tides has got to be better than burning coal, oil or anything else.

Yes, it's not ideal yet.
 
carmanmemoranda said:
The world's climate is judged by what's going on in a town up north.
Click to expand...

noseall said:
Do you think scientists rely on a thermometer readings in Coningsbury, when gathering global warming data?

Lol.
Click to expand...
But this is exactly what the UK media does when they quote the highest "EVER" uk temp. They quote it like its that everywhere at that time - a more accurate measurement surly would be to quote the average UK temp but I suppose that would not produce the affect they are looking for to fit their climate disaster narrative would it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top