The Weather

noseall said:
A single peak of intense days heat, on its own, has little bearing on climate change data
Click to expand...
Tell that to the BBC then who are more than happy jump on random peaks recorded at an RAF base with acres of heatsink concrete and tarmac.
Callpture.JPG
 
aveatry said:
Tell that to the BBC
Click to expand...

The BBC, Sky news, ITN even the Wail like to report report breaking temperatures. Sometimes they might add a "hotter than Athens" or a "hotter than Ibiza".

Still absolutely fack all bearing on overall climate data.
 
carmanmemoranda said:
What bit don't you understand ?
Click to expand...
noseall said:
Still absolutely fack all bearing on overall climate data.
Click to expand...
You are missing my point - I am talking about how the media report it. ---
berty3000 said:
No, this normal process, that would occur in an open, honest and free society doesn't seem to be possible. And so we have endless gaslighting instead. Which many of us see through and are not foold by. In fact, it absolutely undermines the alarmist narrative. It screams weakness, fear and dishonesty.
Click to expand...
What they are doing with their doom laden reporting is turning most people off the whole subject. Maybe they have to lay it on thick for people here because in this country they have a hard sell trying to tell people the climate is warming.
 
dns1 said:
We aren't producing anywhere near the same amounts of CO2 that volcanic activity did a few thousand years ago...

We certainly aren't going to reduce our CO2 emissions by building wind turbines and solar panels (which always have to be backed up by gas or coal power stations) or by increasing tax on people who need to use cars!
Click to expand...
Err no:
en.wikipedia.org

Timeline of volcanism on Earth - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

CO2 from volcanoes may have produced a comparable amount on a geological timescale, but not in the last few thousand years. Over 100s thousands of years, we can see the highest point was 300ppm:
1714396835745.png


Renewables pay their carbon footprint back with a number of months after starting operation typically. This along with nuclear etc. are essential, to decarbonise the grid.
 
wobs said:
Err no:
en.wikipedia.org

Timeline of volcanism on Earth - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

CO2 from volcanoes may have produced a comparable amount on a geological timescale, but not in the last few thousand years. Over 100s thousands of years, we can see the highest point was 300ppm:


Renewables pay their carbon footprint back with a number of months after starting operation typically. This along with nuclear etc. are essential, to decarbonise the grid.
Click to expand...

You can prove anything with facts.
 
The climate is always changing.

All the 5hit being sprayed in the sky won’t help! Oops I better not mention that.
 
motorbiking said:
faster than Younger Dryas event? I don't think so
Click to expand...
That was not a truly global change (but nearly). The effect was less pronounced than what we are seeing.

And the CO2 change less than what we are seeing:
Carbon dioxide levels steadily increased over the course of the Younger Dryas, from circa 210 ppm at its start to circa 275 ppm at its termination.[/quote]

Younger Dryas - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top