Wrong.
He's going for those who don't need it.
And as for "no voice", these are the group on which the tories rely, for core votes.
There goes a lot of your winter fuel payments
- Thread starter gas112
- Start date
Wrong.
He's going for those who don't need it.
And as for "no voice", these are the group on which the tories rely, for core votes.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Poor Mick and Elton won't get their 200-300 quid. Thankfully...
The most vulnerable are the least likely to claim (reams of paperwork/computer use).
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
It's automatic, no need to claim.
457 subscribers
so youve posted some random guy with a channel on youtube with almost no following.........and you think that constitutes evidence
457 subscribers
so youve posted some random guy with a channel on youtube with almost no following.........and you think that constitutes evidence
I think you are losing the plot just lately Notch7, you used to have some common sense.
Watch SIR KEIR STARMER 40 seconds into the video
Perhaps then you will see the IRONY.
NO, it's only sometimes automatic, when you are already claiming benefits.
Try starting a claim.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
Better get Mick and Elton on to it, the sooner the better...
you are the one that has lost the plot
Jeremy Hunt cut NI to try and buy voters, but there was no money to do it, he dishonestly "funded" it by making "savings" to public services
the cut to pensioners is basically a Jeremy Hunt policy
Jeremy Hunt looks to cut NICs again despite IMF warning of £30bn fiscal hole
Jeremy Hunt looks to cut NICs again despite IMF warning of £30bn fiscal hole
World body’s latest health check of UK economy says ‘unpopular revenue-raising measures’ may be needed
www.theguardian.com
You blamed the Tories for all their policies.
Now you blame the Tories for Labour policies.
You are in the rabbit hole.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
You can vote them out next time. Until then, tough.
If you have anything original to say, that would be good.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,336
- Reaction score
- 2,191
- Country
I think the PM made the correct decision based on the state of our finances. Mick and Elton don't need it.
They know that a number of people who could claim pension credits don't. They intend to do something about that. What hasn't really been announced. Some mention of telling them they can but if they know who there could be other options.
I've always thought that there is something odd about them. For instance I usually get £100. My wife the same. Not sure what happens if a single person in a property.
Think that is the correct number as I just transfer mine to the wife what ever it is.The faked up video. Notice Tory discussion on winter fuel and inclusion of things like that. The same view could be used on child benefits. Labour are likely to target real need in this area rather than just increase payments etc.
I don't have the figures to hand, but a single person gets more.
I know this because I had a disabled elderly relative, living alone, who got less one year. On enquiry I found out that another person had claimed at the same address. I notified the benefits office that a person who had visited, and lived in Australia, whom I named, might have made a fraudulent claim. Shortly afterwards my relative received the rest of the payment.
I would be entirely happy if the other person was investigated or even prosecuted on their next visit to UK.