You just opened my eyes here, that's 7.5hrs difference and lets say 55KW used. So does that mean that even though the boiler was on for 2hrs, it was consuming gas at the rate of approx 7.5kw/hr ? Please help me understand it.
I think you should look again: your boiler is rated at 30kW (note the lower case k and upper case W), this means that unless you have other gas appliances of a similar power (or a large leak!) you CANNOT be consuming
at a rate of 55kW.
Please understand the fundamental difference between the kilowatt (kW) and the kilowatt-hour (kWhr).
A 30kW boiler running at maximum load continuously for 3 hours will
consume 90kWhr of energy from burning gas. That's equivalent to 90 'units' of electricity, and is the basis of your gas billing. Your erroneous use of the units of power and energy don't help our understanding of your problem.
UFH has a very high heat capacity, therefore it will take several hours to heat up from cold, and several more to cool down. Benefits are:
1. Warm feet and a cooler head - ie comfort at a lower room temperature; you can set the 'stats lower to achieve a comfortable environment.
2. Lower heating fluid temperatures, increasing boiler efficiency.
3. Lower running costs
when set up and used correctly.
4. Capability to run with alternative (lower carbon) heating sources, such as air source heat pumps.
The downside is that it is not very responsive to changing user habits, but generally the 4C setback overnight works well for most customers.
It has been said that you have a large house, and large houses cost more to run than small houses, and therefore cause more environmental damage than smaller ones too. Your enhanced insulation will pay dividends for many years to come but, just like my old school report, '10 out of 10, could try harder' is the usual comment, meaning that there is
never enough insulation!
The dirty sight glasses (and flow indicators) for the UFH can be cleaned quite easily once removed; it's the lack of access that will be the biggest headache. Once done though, flow balancing can be easily achieved by following the designer's recommendations. In their absence I suggest the following method:
1. Set the pump to its
minimum speed (RTFI for how to do this), with all UFH zones calling for heat.
2. Remove every electric actuator from the manifold; make a note of which goes where, because the rest of this may take several hours to achieve.
3. Open the flow restrictor in each loop to maximum, and observe the flow rates. Restrict flow in the high flow zones to get a reasonable flow in every zone. If this can't be achieved turn the pump speed up one setting (from speed 1 to speed 2).
4. Leave the system for several hours to warm up.
5. Measure the temperatures of the pipework flowing into, and out of each zone. There should be a marked decrease in the return temperatures, but
of highest importance is that each zone's return temperature should be the same within a few degrees.
6. Reduce the flow to those with higher return temperatures, again leaving several hours for stabilisation between iterations of this step.
At the end you should have one zone with its restrictor almost fully open, the pump speed at the minimum needed to circulate, and all return temperatures equal....and all rooms warmer than you would like (to pay for).
7. Replace all zone actuators, and set the room thermostats to your desired values.
Next balance the radiator system and the hot water cylinder.
Bear in mind that you have a hot water cylinder, so the boiler's target temperature should not be set below 65C (flow temperature, as displayed on the boiler) to achieve satisfactory hot water performance (55C to 60C) and legionella control. Sadly the facility of a second boiler set-point for hot water generation seems to have lost favour with boiler manufacturers.
Hope this helps.
MM