Wales becomes Trumpton

You want evidence that, in a collision, 20 is safer than 30? And to think I was accused of trolling..

No.
Carman stated that [others have claimed that a collision at 30 is safer than one at 20].
#782

I said that if this was true, he should have no trouble posting up an example.


Fwiw, I suspect he doesn't mean what he typed, but inferring gets short shrift so I have took him at his word.
 
Why do you try to ignore important elements of driving psychology?
I'm not ignoring anything. It doesn't negate the fact that being in a collision at 20mph is magnitudes safer than one at 50mph.
 
It isn’t better if the side effect is a loss of concentration or over compensation
Of course it is. Losing concentration and causing a collision generally has a better outcome at 20 rather than 50. I can't understand what is so controversial about that.
 
No.
Carman stated that [others have claimed that a collision at 30 is safer than one at 20].
#782

I said that if this was true, he should have no trouble posting up an example.


Fwiw, I suspect he doesn't mean what he typed, but inferring gets short shrift so I have took him at his word.
Try reading what mbk says !
 
An example of someone saying "a collision at 20 is more damaging than one at 30", like you claimed some poster(s) on here had said.

Like I said, as you claimed.
I'm not going back to dig it out.

But read what mbk has claimed
 
Back
Top