Who is attending Church on Easter Sunday?

noseall said:
Irrelevant. God does not have the same political sway in the UK as it does in some parts of the US.

A majority of folk in the US are pro-abortion. The only reason abortion has been restricted in some of the US is due to the imbalance in the Supreme Court justices bias. Abortion is still available to all US women that have the means.

Abortion is still a woman's choice, ultimately. Fudge all to do with men or religion and never should be.
Click to expand...

What's 'God' got to do with it?

Money talks, and American Evangelicals have plenty to wave under the nose of any Tory mp prepared to listen to them. The SC in America isn't as biased as you think, adhering to the letter of the law in most cases and allowing States Rights to advocate their own abortion laws.
 
Odds said:
What's 'God' got to do with it?
Click to expand...
The politics of (US) abortion?

Or abortion in general?

Odds said:
Money talks, and American Evangelicals have plenty to wave under the nose of any Tory mp prepared to listen to them.
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. The US God squad have little sway regards the UK's long standing access and rights to abortion. A few attentive and dollar hungry MP's, won't change a thing.

Odds said:
The SC in America isn't as biased as you think, adhering to the letter of the law in most cases and allowing States Rights to advocate their own abortion laws.
Click to expand...

Which means practically banning abortion in virtually all God bothering Red states.
 
Odds said:
What's 'God' got to do with it?

Money talks, and American Evangelicals have plenty to wave under the nose of any Tory mp prepared to listen to them. The SC in America isn't as biased as you think, adhering to the letter of the law in most cases and allowing States Rights to advocate their own abortion laws.
Click to expand...
The SC is biased though. That bias swings maybe. But it is biased
 
Notch7 said:
Are you serious?
Click to expand...
Yes. In the sense that the members of the SC look at the letter of the law and stick to it. Republican politicians and Trump don't always get their own way. Roe v Wade, however, was a different kettle of fish and never stood a chance when it came up for review. The Evangelicals saw to that.
 
noseall said:
I think he was trying to infer that by allowing the states to make up their own mind on abortion, the SC were somehow being impartial.

[GALLERY=media, 88405][/GALLERY]
Click to expand...
your committment to Windows '95 clip art is weird.
 
Odds said:
Yes. In the sense that the members of the SC look at the letter of the law and stick to it. Republican politicians and Trump don't always get their own way. Roe v Wade, however, was a different kettle of fish and never stood a chance when it came up for review. The Evangelicals saw to that.
Click to expand...
Legally Roe v Wade shouldn't have been reviewed at all.
 
So just to be clear, you enlightened and caring fellows believe in the importance of a woman being able to choose, but not the importance of that woman existing in the first place?

Interesting.

Noting that the ability to make such a choice safely has only recently come about thanks to surgical and chemical processes. So, not exactly something we can consider a "natural" right.

Anyway, I'll leave you to keep shouting about it. Much more peaceful in the reasoned middle ground, where I shall remain.
 
noseall said:
Which means practically banning abortion in virtually all God bothering Red states.
Click to expand...

Or areas with Muslims and sharia law, which you might have in your own vicinity in future.

Another one of those areas where the Labour party and lefties seem a tad confused...
 
In case people aren't aware the UK public is overwhelmingly in favour of abortion rights.

yougov.co.uk

Where does the British public stand on abortion in 2023? | YouGov

Abortion is widely supported in the UK
yougov.co.uk yougov.co.uk

87% for it in general and 65% say it should be on demand for before 24 weeks. Only 1% think it should be banned entirely.

I think it's interesting to see how my views line up with the rest of the country. For those that want to ban it, or even restrict it more, they're in a minority.
 
We work for all sorts of religions / believers / churches

Scientologist church

Plymouth brethren ( individuals )

Unatarian church

Baptist centre ( happy clappy church )

Muslims and Hindus ( individuals )

C E church
 
berty3000 said:
So just to be clear, you enlightened and caring fellows believe in the importance of a woman being able to choose, but not the importance of that woman existing in the first place?
Click to expand...
2 people had a sh@g

If they hadn’t, the potential of a person would not have occurred

Your argument is nonsense

berty3000 said:
Noting that the ability to make such a choice safely has only recently come about thanks to surgical and chemical processes. So, not exactly something we can consider a "natural" right.
Click to expand...
Nobody said it was a natural right.

Do you really think nobody would see through such a weak strawman

berty3000 said:
Anyway, I'll leave you
Click to expand...
Good

berty3000 said:
Much more peaceful in the reasoned middle ground
Click to expand...
Nothing reasoned about you

A right wing grifter
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top