So just to be clear, you enlightened and caring fellows believe in the importance of a woman being able to choose, but not the importance of that woman existing in the first place?
That is quite the stupidest argument against abortion I have ever come across. It makes about as much sense as Chris Finch arguing "How can I hate women? My mum's one"
Always. It's how it is and always should be. If she doesn't want to continue with her pregnancy - her choice and hers alone.you enlightened and caring fellows believe in the importance of a woman being able to choose
What logical inconsistencies?. I am simply drawing attention to the logical inconsistencies in the thinking
You mean the Evangelical Church protested and pestered the SC until they changed the law - democracy in action?Legally Roe v Wade shouldn't have been reviewed at all.
The need for women to have access to abortion hasn't changed a great deal, has it? They now have to travel across states to do it or rely upon access to abortion pills.Why should Roe v Wade not have been reviewed? A great deal has changed since 1973.
Stare decisis.You mean the Evangelical Church protested and pestered the SC until they changed the law - democracy in action?
I'm still pro-choice but the way Feminists argue their case is just as radical as the anti-abortion lobby.
Why should Roe v Wade not have been reviewed? A great deal has changed since 1973.
Just more Republican stupidity and cruelty. The demand for abortion is as important and essential as it has always been. The morons in the red states just make abortion more difficult and cause women unnecessary suffering. The wealthy women will probably be ok. They will even prosecute you for helping a woman in dire trouble. Cruel thoughtless dumb bastards.Overturning Roe Vs Wade was very controversial procedurally and technically.
It'd been coming for many years and compares with the Brex*it issue in the UK; a long standing dissatisfaction with the terms of legislation and a growing lobby agitating to repeal the law in their favour, stooping to all kinds of misinformation and lies in order to win the argument. I don't know the legal ins & outs but since 2008 when the 'Tea Party' grew from strength to strength and mutated into the MAGA movement, Evangelical Christians have held their nose and voted for Trump because he's "their guy". They know he's a conman, a misogynist, a thief...and all kinds of wrong, but they say it's worth it to achieve their stated aim of returning America 'to God'.Stare decisis.
The US supreme court doesn't change the law, or at least it shouldn't. It clarifies what the law means, once clarified it is supposed to be left alone unless the Senate changes what the law should be. Overturning Roe Vs Wade was very controversial procedurally and technically.
..only amongst Republican politicians and their supporters.It'd been coming for many years
Mitch McConnell understands American politics better than anyone and he realised it's State legislature where the grass roots grow, enabling the Republicans to spread across the Senate where the law is made real. Becoming President is easy enough with more money than Midas; any fool can do it...even Trump. But if you have one seat more than the other side you will win the day. And it's all down to very few votes across a huge electorate that really makes the difference. It could be as few as 10,000 votes in Nevada or Georgia in one District - and that's the crux of their strategy. Focussing on particular Districts with money and advertising ensures their message is repeated louder than Democrats can maintain until they can swing the state in their favour. Similar tactics are used in the abortion issue and Democrats realised the dangers far too late...only amongst Republican politicians and their supporters.
Having access to abortion is just as popular in the US as it's always been. A majority of US citizens support access to abortion. Whom ever controls the legislature controls the laws - however few.
Always. It's how it is and always should be. If she doesn't want to continue with her pregnancy - her choice and hers alone.
WHAT THE F*CK????But the woman wouldn't exist at all if her mother had chosen to terminate her during pregnancy... j