Wind Turbines

The basis of the nuc need comes down to it doesn't matter what number of wind turbines are installed as lack of wind still causes problems
Which nuclear does very little to cover. It can't scale up if there's a lull. What you want is gas with carbon capture
 
My suggestion is that, in practice, storage and efficiency (for example; maybe actually listen to what insulate Britain have to say) though less manly and sexy than more generation, would be practically more helpful...
 
I remember when pumped water storage was being built in Scotland, it was trumpeted as if it was an important big thing, but the actual generation figures are so small that they are insignificant, except for balancing short term peaks and troughs.
 
I hope that's not the 25 year old report compiled by the Nuclear lobby for the purpose of discrediting renewables.
 
I hope that's not the 25 year old report compiled by the Nuclear lobby for the purpose of discrediting renewables.
Really?? I think it's just a case of the fact that the numbers don't stack up and the £34b would be a hell of a lot higher now,
 
I remember when pumped water storage was being built in Scotland, it was trumpeted as if it was an important big thing, but the actual generation figures are so small that they are insignificant, except for balancing short term peaks and troughs.
Balancing peaks and troughs (needed to manage nuclear power and coal fired systems) isn't trivial. It saves a lot of money done right.

But if you want more, how about this?


Another 3-4GW of generating power and some of them are designed for over 24 hours duration so they can be used for inter day management.
 
Balancing peaks and troughs (needed to manage nuclear power and coal fired systems) isn't trivial. It saves a lot of money done right.
More allowing gas fired turbines to be run up. We have one finished, working and used. Dinorwig. Surplus power is used to pump water up. Running that off can help with peaks. The advantage is the speed in which they can be set to generate and for that matter top up the reservoir.
 
So we need more wind turbines and dams. When we don't need the power but have the wind we can pump water back into the resevoir and when we do need the power and we dont have the wind we can open the resevoir.

The resevoir acts as a battery or buffer to manage peaks and troughs in demand and production.
 
The resevoir acts as a battery or buffer to manage peaks and troughs in demand and production.
It's not very efficient. Losses pumping the water up and from then using it to generate. They also need a suitable site.

Many countries are using lithium batteries to achieve the same thing. Tesla often figures in that area. Dinorwig is good at handling what is sometimes referred to as electric kettle peaks - things that don't last very long and also if needed give time to allow other sources to be bought on line. There is plenty about it on the wiki and it seems others may be built
The scheme can supply a maximum power of 1,728 MW (2,317,000 hp) and has a storage capacity of around 9.1 GWh (33 TJ).[2]

Wind - simple view - depends on how long periods of high pressure over the country figure in our weather map. LOL That map makes me wonder if all turbines should be on the west side of the country. Beasts from the east are relatively rare.
 
It's not very efficient. Losses pumping the water up and from then using it to generate. They also need a suitable site.
It's 75% efficient which is pretty good.

Lithium ion is 90%. Compressed air might be between 50 and 70%, but hydrogen would be around 40-50%.
 
but hydrogen would be around 40-50%.
Interesting one as there are signs that the world is going to need rather a lot of it - at some point. That largely down to the power needed to create it. Once you have enough of it it's relatively easy to use. The problem is the green power needed to produce it in a green fashion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top