with all the Palestinian journalists assassinated, and protesters redefined as terrorist supporters, it's only the shameless bragging by the culprits that we get to see.
Zion and the Art of Armageddon
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
The Zionists claim they used small bombs to kill two Hamas commanders inside buildings near tents where the fire broke out, then say the explosion must've come from an ammunition warehouse - another incident killed another twenty civilians today taking the total over 36,000, which isn't enough for their bloodthirsty God. Aid trucks average ten per day. Can the US rebuild their pier to stage a spectacular and distract us all from this madness? They may as well, for all the help it brings.
Another hit on tents - in what is said to be a safe zone.
Israel's latest on the other one - what they used could not cause a fire. Mentions Kg of explosives, smallest the plane can use. So investigating. US attitude - look on the bright side 2 HAMAS killed. Ideally that sort of thing needs to be verified.
They seem to have forgotten what could happen if there was a fire around. Standard method of cooking and heating water etc in camps.
Israel's latest on the other one - what they used could not cause a fire. Mentions Kg of explosives, smallest the plane can use. So investigating. US attitude - look on the bright side 2 HAMAS killed. Ideally that sort of thing needs to be verified.
They seem to have forgotten what could happen if there was a fire around. Standard method of cooking and heating water etc in camps.
Israel say they didn't carry out a strike. They're not normally shy putting their hand up.
Yes they are, they frequently claim that people were shot or blown up by anyone other than them.
I included a link to an investigation into a journalist shot by the IDF which they attempted to pin on anyone else. It's a common occurrence.
The map is the one published by the IDF, however the map is not the only story. The post code that the strike occurred in was not shown as a safe zone in the picture, but it was listed as a safe zone in the text that accompanied the image.
And do we have that text?
2360, 2371 and 2372 are all in the text in the video. The animation they used is also awful as it made the safe zone look much bigger than it was on the static image you quote.
I believe the strike was in 2372 (corrected), although I have no idea how far the fires spread.
The IDF is about as reliable as the Russian MOD.
Last edited:
BBC have a page on the general problems with the safe zones. Errors and confusion. Should be easy to find.
On the strike with fire. C4 had a brit doc in a group that has decided to stay on the phone, only contact method. Field hospital. There has been mention of some people being sent there. They treated 31 people, burns and shrapnel. Some amputations needed. They can't keep people for long. It's get people fixed and then out. Also regular loud explosions all day but can't really comment on distances. This reminds me of another Brit doc who has returned. Just got out in time. Explosions either side of the house they were staying in - rather odd given it was a safe area. He spent most of his time trying to clean up infected wounds that had been treated earlier. This group filled it's suitcases with medical treatment gear, Good job they did, They finished the stay by remaining in the hospital.
On the strike with fire. C4 had a brit doc in a group that has decided to stay on the phone, only contact method. Field hospital. There has been mention of some people being sent there. They treated 31 people, burns and shrapnel. Some amputations needed. They can't keep people for long. It's get people fixed and then out. Also regular loud explosions all day but can't really comment on distances. This reminds me of another Brit doc who has returned. Just got out in time. Explosions either side of the house they were staying in - rather odd given it was a safe area. He spent most of his time trying to clean up infected wounds that had been treated earlier. This group filled it's suitcases with medical treatment gear, Good job they did, They finished the stay by remaining in the hospital.
... but also, it doesn't matter if it was or wasn't a 'safe zone'. The IDF clearly didn't do a proper assessment of the scale of collateral damage that would happen.
It doesn't matter where refugees put tents up, you have to try to avoid decapitating their babies and burning them to death.
It doesn't matter where refugees put tents up, you have to try to avoid decapitating their babies and burning them to death.
The famous one? She was used to this sort of situation and moved next to a wall. Looking at that it was hit by a number of shots around where she was. Bullet - a US special intended to penetrate bullet proof vests. The one in her head was the type Israel use.
There is a shrine to her in the west bank. IDF have photo's taken standing next to it. Big grin.
Two bombs, they claim, were used in the attack: one for the Hamas commanders, which can be considered a legitimate target and the other was used to destroy an ammunition dump nearby. Also a legitimate target of war, it can be said. However, the proximity of the warehouse to refugees meant the IDF knew there'd be collateral damage and went ahead with the strike anyway, showing their total disregard for civilian casualties as the assault on Rafah goes ahead.
Why?
If they knew the commanders would be there at a certain time, how is it not possible to send a special forces team in to assassinate them and minimise the risk to Palestinians sheltering from the assault on Rafah? When the British Army found an IRA hideout during The Troubles it wouldn't drop a bomb through the roof or send an rpg through the window. Great care was taken to avoid civilian casualties, yet the Zionist campaign is deliberately designed to cause maximum devastation regardless of how many innocent people are nearby.
There is no justification for these war crimes under International Law.
Why?
If they knew the commanders would be there at a certain time, how is it not possible to send a special forces team in to assassinate them and minimise the risk to Palestinians sheltering from the assault on Rafah? When the British Army found an IRA hideout during The Troubles it wouldn't drop a bomb through the roof or send an rpg through the window. Great care was taken to avoid civilian casualties, yet the Zionist campaign is deliberately designed to cause maximum devastation regardless of how many innocent people are nearby.
There is no justification for these war crimes under International Law.
Compatible with the actions of a racist army committing genocide.
The Warsaw ghetto was also destroyed with the same mindset.