Congratulations sir kier

motorbiking said:
Then quit and get a job you like.
Click to expand...

Just coz a tnuc moves the goalposts, or is inept enough to be unable to manage their dept or company such that their staff feel they have no alternative but to withdraw their labour..........

.......sounds like it is the tnuc who should be quitting, as they are the problem (y)
 
ajohn said:
The answer to NINBY's seems to be that national interests are far more important, This includes more onshore windmills.
Click to expand...
There's an element of truth in this. We seem to do a lot of debating in the UK, with proposals being considered by this group, that group and the other group. x years later a decision is reached, often appearing to be the 'do little/nothing' option.

When it comes to any sort of change, those individuals and/or groups who feel adversely affected by said change will, understandably, be against it. Most of us are like this and it's fully understandable.

There are usually winners and losers when it comes to changes like slapping up 500 new homes or huge windmills. However to progress, we need these changes, otherwise we stand still.
 
motorbiking said:
Then quit and get a job you like.
Click to expand...
That easy eh. Spend a large chunk of your life and financial expense training to be a professional and throw it all in because the pay and conditions are rubbish. Perhaps these people (collectively) feel they can convince those that wield the power, to make things better for them. Better than throwing away tens of thousands of £££££ on training and years of sweat and toil, just to quit and get a different job.

What makes you think they dislike the job, in any case?
 
denso13 said:
Same as the Tory ones? Did you ask questions about those failures?
Click to expand...
Did the Tories have mandatory figures for house building? I can’t recall that. Who did they mandate to build them? Private companies? Local councils? Noseall?
 
ajohn said:
Reeves just made a speech. They are going to get them. Initial step but there is more.
Reintroduce house building targets that have to be met.
Click to expand...
It could turn into a free for all.
ajohn said:
The answer to NINBY's seems to be that national interests are far more important,
Click to expand...
Tell that to the brexxers
ajohn said:
This includes more onshore windmills.
Click to expand...
Rural locations, what goes around comes around
ajohn said:
The general idea is to speed up planning. If it stalls it seems Labour's attack dog moves in. Already at work. Houses - job availability will figure on where.

She points out that tough changes have just caused plans to be dropped or take years. No more of that.
Click to expand...
The building industry has a finite number of skilled workers, will labor bring in east european workers
ajohn said:
NINBY's - C4 asked about an unused WWII airfield in Surrey, LOL They might find it gets built on anyway but other factors figure.
Click to expand...
We might need it for pootin
ajohn said:
Times asked about the Farage idea in QE and interest. No change just like the Tory. Those gave 2 reasons. Guilts selling at a loss and also bank etc finally being competitive on what they will offer on cash ISA's and people now moving them around.
Click to expand...

Far rage thinks Liz Trussed had the right idea but went about the wrong way
ajohn said:
Awkward sod's questions. When will the public feel the effects of growth? Answer if they hit 2% an extra £58b appears. They can only try and boost growth. The main aim there is stability to achieve investments. We haven't had that for a long time.
Click to expand...
Borrowing and issuing gilts may create inflation. But I remember a few toreys around the time of brexhit, saying inflation wasn't a bad thing
 
denso13 said:
Manifesto pledge.

www.bbc.co.uk

New homes: What's the new government's housebuilding target?

The target, set out in the 2024 Labour manifesto, is for 1.5 million new homes over the next parliament.
www.bbc.co.uk


You'd need to ask Rishi that, Tories had 14 years of failure, you've given Labour 4 days.
Click to expand...
I’m not knocking Labour at all. The Tories had a 'target'. That want met. Labour has said that they will make it mandatory. All I’m asking is how are they going to do that? It’s not like setting a mandatory speed limit or making it mandatory that people pay tax. If people don’t abide by these mandatory rules, they are fined. Who are labour going to fine if the mandatory number of houses aren’t built?
 
Mottie said:
I’m not knocking Labour at all. The Tories had a 'target'. That want met. Labour has said that they will make it mandatory. All I’m asking is how are they going to do that? It’s not like setting a mandatory speed limit or making it mandatory that people pay tax. If people don’t abide by these mandatory rules, they are fined. Who are labour going to fine if the mandatory number of houses aren’t built?
Click to expand...
Its going to very difficult, insufficient planners to identify the sites, insufficient workers to build the houses, plenty of scope for legal challenges by parish and district councils and housebuilders who are not happy with what is being imposed on them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top