Who's main interest is selling newspapers rather than accuracy. Sales declining but the same aspect figures in social media. Clicks = money.the same right wing media whose
Who's main interest is selling newspapers rather than accuracy. Sales declining but the same aspect figures in social media. Clicks = money.the same right wing media whose
Tell you what notchy you'll be on the pan crack in a bit with the amount of time you spend on here, do you ever do any work?have you ever thought why?
are people happier not working?
Deary deary deary me ...I am quite happy for you to say "some people on benefits are scroungers"
I am not happy for you to talk about " people on benefits are scroungers"
deflectionDeary deary deary me ...
That's all this merits.
The answer is less and less will be will replying when you increasingly keep coming out with horseshxt like this.deflection
You are avoiding making a response because you know I’m correct.
It is very relevant, though, for informing the wider debate and public perception. I think it is only logical that people will be more angry about those who do this if they believe they are living the life of riley.
Living the life of riley, or simply just getting by - They should be made to work, and contribute. It's neither fair, no reasonable, to expect those good people working, to support them in the life of ease.
What I was asking, though, was for those who play the system, would it make people more angry if the amount of benefit they received allowed them to live in nice warm house with plenty of food and money for eating out etc, rather than surviving on beans in a cold, damp bedsit.
It is important to qualify statements like "people on benefits are scroungers"
because otherwise the false narrative leads us to believe everybody on benefits is a scrounger
I am quite happy for you to say "some people on benefits are scroungers"
I am not happy for you to talk about " people on benefits are scroungers"
****** so your saying people haven't the nouse to work out not all people on benifits are scroungers.Correct.
Right wing idiots love to stereotype****** so your saying people haven't the nouse to work out not all people on benifits are scroungers.
Just another example of notchy projecting, making a statement that is a needless one.
It's not though is it.More rubbish.
Gammon Daily Wail readers? Not a fugging chance, no.so your saying people haven't the nouse to work out not all people on benifits are scroungers.