D
Deleted member 294929
You done a Google didn't youThey both are, dopey.
You done a Google didn't youThey both are, dopey.
Oh yes.Do you believe there has ever been a miscarriage of justice?
No, he was threatened with 40 years in jail, so he accepted a plea bargain.
doesn’t mean he was guilty
The autopsy said he was murdered by Derek Chauvin. No ifs, no buts.I don't believe a policeman killed him.
Everyone knows that Charles Bronson is an actor.You done a Google didn't you
A New York City architect becomes a one-man vigilante squad after his wife is murdered by street punks. In self-defense, the vengeful man kills muggers on the mean streets after dark.
But it does mean that he (and any legal representation he had) thought he was more likely to be found guilty than not, does it not?
Do you believe there has ever been a miscarriage of justice?
It didn't.Now if the autopsy above concluded that the death was due to drugs then how could the judge and jury grind him guilty?
I really don't believe you are still posting this rubbish.So my argument is the judge and jury and the whole shebang was to scared to find him not guilty through fear.
Now if the autopsy above concluded that the death was due to drugs then how could the judge and jury grind him guilty?
You must be new here.I really don't believe you are still posting this rubbish..
He has definitely gone over to the dark sideYou must be new here.
Totally wrong.
The whole argument is that it is not for the police to decide, but a court
Ask bod.Who said other wise ?
Ask bod.
The guy was automatically guilty and didn't need to go before a court
You've consistently said the guy was guilty and wasn't killed by a policeman.Not what I said at all.
Carmanisamoronda is making things up again