This is somthing to ponder on

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 294929
  • Start date Start date
You've consistently said the guy was guilty and wasn't killed by a policeman.

Didn't need a court because of his lifestyle

Either you support police killing without court involvement after or you don't.

It's you that's swerving,not others

WTF are you on about ???

The question as I see it is was the death of the bloke murder or not

Simples

Or are you saying if plod is confronted by an armed assailant that fires at them

They will have to get on the blower to some court official prior to returning fire ?? Just in case they kill ( murder) them
:ROFLMAO:
 
WTF are you on about ???

The question as I see it is was the death of the bloke murder or not

Simples

Or are you saying if plod is confronted by an armed assailant that fires at them

They will have to get on the blower to some court official prior to returning fire ?? Just in case they kill ( murder) them
:ROFLMAO:
No point answering that.

You obviously don't understand the points I've made
 
WTF are you on about ???

The question as I see it is was the death of the bloke murder or not

Simples

Or are you saying if plod is confronted by an armed assailant that fires at them

They will have to get on the blower to some court official prior to returning fire ?? Just in case they kill ( murder) them
:ROFLMAO:
Making things up again trans
 
No point answering that.

You obviously don't understand the points I've made

Neither do you :ROFLMAO:

You can see it now

Massive legal group actions against plod for arresting claustrophobic suspects
Who can’t be put in a police car
Who cannot be detained in a holding cell

Claustrophobic white suspects need not apply :ROFLMAO:
 
Neither do you :ROFLMAO:

You can see it now

Massive legal group actions against plod for arresting claustrophobic suspects
Who can’t be put in a police car
Who cannot be detained in a holding cell

Claustrophobic white suspects need not apply :ROFLMAO:
Just showing more ignorance of the points made.

Carry on
 
No point answering that.

You obviously don't understand the points I've made
He never does.
He just witters on in his own little world, promoting nuclear destruction of the planet, and death to everyone. :rolleyes:

And Bod and sillyboy conflate fact with fiction. I'm not sure if they really can't diiferentiate the difference, or if they're resorting to blatant lies because their argument is busted.
 
And Bod and sillyboy conflate fact with fiction. I'm not sure if they really can't diiferentiate the difference, or if they're resorting to blatant lies because their argument is busted.
That's because you thought Charles Bronson was the actor.
:LOL:
 
Now if the autopsy above concluded that the death was due to drugs then how could the judge and jury grind him guilty?
They couldn't/wouldn't. But they did because all the evidence was that he committed murder.
 
Back
Top