- Joined
- 16 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
More than sensible. I am not fully sure.. it looked like a rolled steel section lintel.. a steel beam with much wider lower part for inner and outer brick leafWhat sort of steel lintel was it , had it been rustproofed ? Was it over an internal opening or in an external wall ? Sensible questions I hope you agree.
Stick around to learn
Yes well i was surprised myself. BUT it makes sense because the steel bars inside are rusty thus expanding and making it more prone to crack after a few years..Makes you wonder how much structural strength the original had, if merely drilling it broke it
Well i am going to put wooden blinds like all the rest of the house. They are heavy and you can add screws as much as you need the best obviously turbo gold screws no pilot hole needed ever.. I dont think 100£+ for and oak beam/lintel is bad honestly.?What do you intend using for fixing into the oak lintel ?
p s oak is obviously a more durable (and expensive ) material than the timber most people on here will be referring to when discussing structural timber in building which is usually stress graded softwood .
Like i said the house is bone dry including the brick walls i have to liberally spray water a few times to get the mortar in there otherwise it was drying straight away and cracking. Bricks say Castle and few forest on top looks to be good quality bricks with original lime mortar still surprisingly good and looks to be moving with the house..The point I'm making is that timber elements are only used where there is no possibility of dampness. If the wall is damp to the point where an inner timber lintel decays, then there are more significant problems than lintel decay.
There are millions of older pre-1914 houses with solid walls, and with stone lintels or brick arches externally, and timber lintels internally.