No, I don’t but I do read of convicted terrorists indoctrinating others in jail.
#22Where?
No, I don’t but I do read of convicted terrorists indoctrinating others in jail.
#22Where?
So you agree the Policeman killed him, its just terminology that you disagree with
That was in Afghanistan. What do you expect?
None of those happend. Derek Chauvin knelt on his neck for about 9 minutes despite the concerns and portestation of bystanders and other emergency workers.Well his actions lead to the blokes death
But imo it’s not murder
Tazoring some one could lead to that persons death ?? Afaik there have been instances of this
Same when plod have fired rubber bullets afaik it has caused fatalities ??
Ah right. So they should have been killed instead of being put in prison. Is that what you are saying?That was in Afghanistan. What do you expect?
Probably thought they were being hug-a-hoodie tarts like yourself.None of those happend. Derek Chauvin knelt on his neck for about 9 minutes despite the concerns and portestation of bystanders and other emergency workers.
We were talking about the UK justice system.Ah right. So they should have been killed instead of being put in prison. Is that what you are saying?
Idiot.Probably thought they were being hug-a-hoodie tarts like yourself.
Either you support police taking any action they want.Probably thought they were being hug-a-hoodie tarts like yourself.
Either you support police taking any action they want.
Or you support only legally aurhorised action.
You can't have it both ways
Can you add some meaning to that post, please?Encrochat ?? Evidence
Legally authorised ? Action ??
If someone was threatening or endangering life, and you acted in self defence ,it surely wouldn't be murder.If some one is threatening or endangering some ones life ? And said police are armed ect
In such cases instant justice ?
You're happy with police taking any action they see fit ?You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.